On Thu, 23 Aug 2007 18:12:19 +0200
Arnd Bergmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> On Thursday 23 August 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Please check "unit-id" if "physical-id" doesn't exist. Because Celleb
> > uses "unit-id" to provide spe_id.

Sorry for the late answer, wasn't on cc
and had to receive all mails of the last 6 month once again :-(

Can you check if the patch below is working with celleb device tree ?

------
Subject: spu_manage: fix spu_unit_number for celleb device tree

From: Christian Krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

New device trees provide "physical-id".
Celleb device tree provide the "unit-id".
Legacy device tree used the reg property for the physical id of an spe.
This patch fixes find_spu_unit_number to look for the spu id in that order.
The length is checked to avoid misinterpretation in case the attributes
unit-id or reg do not contain the id.

Signed-off-by: Christian Krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Index: linux/arch/powerpc/platforms/cell/spu_manage.c
===================================================================
--- linux.orig/arch/powerpc/platforms/cell/spu_manage.c
+++ linux/arch/powerpc/platforms/cell/spu_manage.c
@@ -48,10 +48,18 @@ static u64 __init find_spu_unit_number(s
 {
        const unsigned int *prop;
        int proplen;
+
+       /* new device trees should provide the physical-id attribute */
        prop = of_get_property(spe, "physical-id", &proplen);
        if (proplen == 4)
                return (u64)*prop;
 
+       /* celleb device tree provides the unit-id */
+       prop = of_get_property(spe, "unit-id", &proplen);
+       if (proplen == 4)
+               return (u64)*prop;
+
+       /* legacy device trees provide the id in the reg attribute */
        prop = of_get_property(spe, "reg", &proplen);
        if (proplen == 4)
                return (u64)*prop;


-- 
Mit freundlichen GrĂ¼ssen,
kind regards,

Christian Krafft
IBM Systems & Technology Group, 
Linux Kernel Development
IT Specialist
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev

Reply via email to