From: Jan-Bernd Themann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2007 13:21:09 +0200
> Problem for multi queue driver with interrupt distribution scheme set to > round robin for this simple example: > Assuming we have 2 SLOW CPUs. CPU_1 is under heavy load (applications). CPU_2 > is not under heavy load. Now we receive a lot of packets (high load > situation). > Receive queue 1 (RQ1) is scheduled on CPU_1. NAPI-Poll does not manage to > empty > RQ1 ever, so it stays on CPU_1. The second receive queue (RQ2) is scheduled on > CPU_2. As that CPU is not under heavy load, RQ2 can be emptied, and the next > IRQ > for RQ2 will go to CPU_1. Then both RQs are on CPU_1 and will stay there if > no IRQ is forced at some time as both RQs are never emptied completely. Why would RQ2's IRQ move over to CPU_1? That's stupid. If you lock the IRQs to specific cpus, the load adjusts automatically. Because packet work, in high load situations, will be processed via ksoftirqd daemons even if the packet is not for a user application's socket. In such a case the scheduler will move the user applications that are now not able to get their timeslices over to a less busy cpu. If you keep moving the interrupts around, the scheduler cannot react properly and it makes the situation worse. _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev