On Thu, Sep 20, 2007 at 07:11:59PM +0200, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> > - (the big one) Despite the name, this driver really has
> > nothing to do with drivers/mtd/physmap.c. The fact that the flash
> > chips must be physically direct mapped is a constrant, but doesn't
> > really say anything about the actual purpose of this driver, which is
> > to instantiate MTD devices based on information from the device tree.
> > Therefore the physmap name is replaced everywhere within the file with
> > "of_flash".
>
> Do you think this code will handle NAND flash later, too? If not,
> maybe "of_norflash" is better?
Uh.. maybe? I guess we can either extend it or rename it in the
future sometime.
--
David Gibson | I'll have my music baroque, and my code
david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au | minimalist, thank you. NOT _the_ _other_
| _way_ _around_!
http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
