On Thu, Sep 20, 2007 at 07:11:59PM +0200, Segher Boessenkool wrote: > > - (the big one) Despite the name, this driver really has > > nothing to do with drivers/mtd/physmap.c. The fact that the flash > > chips must be physically direct mapped is a constrant, but doesn't > > really say anything about the actual purpose of this driver, which is > > to instantiate MTD devices based on information from the device tree. > > Therefore the physmap name is replaced everywhere within the file with > > "of_flash". > > Do you think this code will handle NAND flash later, too? If not, > maybe "of_norflash" is better?
Uh.. maybe? I guess we can either extend it or rename it in the future sometime. -- David Gibson | I'll have my music baroque, and my code david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au | minimalist, thank you. NOT _the_ _other_ | _way_ _around_! http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev