David Gibson wrote:
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] {
>> + #address-cells = <1>;
>> + #size-cells = <0>;
>> device_type = "i2c";
>
> Hrm... we probably want an "i2c" device_type class, but I don't think
> we've actually defined one, which is a problem
Right... but we need to get the kernel to stop expecting the device type
to be there before we yell at people for including it. :-)
> The fact that NVRAM+RTC chips are so common is a bit of an issue from
> the point of view of defining a device class binding - a device can't
> have type "rtc" and "nvram".
This is one of the reasons that I'd prefer to use compatible for such
things.
-Scott
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
