On Fri, 05 Oct 2007 00:34:45 +1000 Michael Ellerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 2007-10-04 at 05:56 -0500, Josh Boyer wrote: > > On Wed, 2007-10-03 at 22:50 -0600, Grant Likely wrote: > > > From: Grant Likely <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > > dcr.c is an arch/powerpc only thing. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Grant Likely <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > --- > > > > > > Ben/Paulus, > > > > > > As far as I can tell this is correct. Having sysdev/dcr.c in the arch/ppc > > > build spits out warnings. Grep doesn't show anything in arch/ppc that > > > is using it. > > > > Sorry, no. The ibm_emac driver uses it, which is arch/ppc. (Yes, the > > old one.) > > > > If there are warnings, let's fix those up. Perhaps Michael's recent > > patches in that area introduced something. > > Hmm, I picked a good time to be away :) > > I think it's OK. ibm_emac uses dcr_write() but it should always be using > the native one from dcr-native.h. So I think this patch is good. Agreed. > Just another reason to get rid of arch/ppc :D Agreed. josh _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list [email protected] https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
