Joachim Fenkes wrote: > Roland Dreier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 10.12.2007 22:47:37:
>> It's an optional device feature, so this should be OK >> (although the iSER driver currently seems to depend on a device >> supporting FMRs, which is probably going to be a problem with iWARP >> support in the future anyway). > I don't feel very well with removing code from the driver that iSER seems > to depend on. Are there plans to fix this in iSER? What is the fix you suggest, to add a device query that tells you for which verbs the documentation does not apply? or enhance the code of the map_phys_fmr verb within the ehca driver to return error if called from non-sleepable context? Or. _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
