On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 08:31:16AM -0500, Rob Herring wrote: >On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 6:56 PM, Gavin Shan <gws...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote: >> On Tue, Mar 01, 2016 at 08:40:12PM -0600, Rob Herring wrote: >>>On Thu, Feb 18, 2016 at 9:16 PM, Gavin Shan <gws...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> >>>wrote: >>>> On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 08:59:53AM -0600, Rob Herring wrote: >>>>>On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 9:44 PM, Gavin Shan <gws...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> >>>>>wrote: >>>>>> This renames unflatten_dt_node() to unflatten_dt_nodes() as it >>>>>> populates multiple device nodes from FDT blob. No logical changes >>>>>> introduced. >>>>>> >>>>>> Signed-off-by: Gavin Shan <gws...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> >>>>>> --- >>>>>> drivers/of/fdt.c | 14 +++++++------- >>>>>> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) >>>>> >>>>>Acked-by: Rob Herring <r...@kernel.org> >>>>> >>>>>I'm happy to take patches 40-42 for 4.6 if the rest of the series >>>>>doesn't go in given they fix a separate problem. I just need to know >>>>>soon (or at least they need to go into -next soon). >>>>> >>>> >>>> Thanks for quick response, Rob. It depends how much comments I will >>>> receive for the powerpc/powernv part. Except that, all parts including >>>> this one have been ack'ed. I can discuss it with Michael Ellerman. >>>> By the way, how soon you need the decision to merge 40-42? If that's >>>> one or two weeks later, I don't think the reivew on the whole series >>>> can be done. >>> >>>Well, it's been 2 weeks now. I need to know this week. >>> >>>> Also, I think you probably can merge 40-44 as they're all about >>>> fdt.c. If they can be merged at one time, I needn't bother (cc) >>>> you again if I need send a updated revision. Thanks for your >>>> review. >>> >>>I did not include 43 and 44 as they are only needed for the rest of your >>>series. >>> >> >> Rob, sorry for late reponse. I really expect this series to be merged to 4.6 >> and >> I was checking reviewers' bandwidth to review it. Unfortunately, I didn't >> receive >> any comments except yours until now. That means this series has to miss 4.6. >> Please >> pick/merge 41 and 42 if no body has objection. Thanks again for your time on >> this. > >Too late for 4.6. >
Yeah, Sorry about that, Rob. Thanks, Gavin _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev