On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 08:31:16AM -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
>On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 6:56 PM, Gavin Shan <gws...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
>> On Tue, Mar 01, 2016 at 08:40:12PM -0600, Rob Herring wrote:
>>>On Thu, Feb 18, 2016 at 9:16 PM, Gavin Shan <gws...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> 
>>>wrote:
>>>> On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 08:59:53AM -0600, Rob Herring wrote:
>>>>>On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 9:44 PM, Gavin Shan <gws...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> 
>>>>>wrote:
>>>>>> This renames unflatten_dt_node() to unflatten_dt_nodes() as it
>>>>>> populates multiple device nodes from FDT blob. No logical changes
>>>>>> introduced.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Gavin Shan <gws...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>  drivers/of/fdt.c | 14 +++++++-------
>>>>>>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>>>>>
>>>>>Acked-by: Rob Herring <r...@kernel.org>
>>>>>
>>>>>I'm happy to take patches 40-42 for 4.6 if the rest of the series
>>>>>doesn't go in given they fix a separate problem. I just need to know
>>>>>soon (or at least they need to go into -next soon).
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Thanks for quick response, Rob. It depends how much comments I will
>>>> receive for the powerpc/powernv part. Except that, all parts including
>>>> this one have been ack'ed. I can discuss it with Michael Ellerman.
>>>> By the way, how soon you need the decision to merge 40-42? If that's
>>>> one or two weeks later, I don't think the reivew on the whole series
>>>> can be done.
>>>
>>>Well, it's been 2 weeks now. I need to know this week.
>>>
>>>> Also, I think you probably can merge 40-44 as they're all about
>>>> fdt.c. If they can be merged at one time, I needn't bother (cc)
>>>> you again if I need send a updated revision. Thanks for your
>>>> review.
>>>
>>>I did not include 43 and 44 as they are only needed for the rest of your 
>>>series.
>>>
>>
>> Rob, sorry for late reponse. I really expect this series to be merged to 4.6 
>> and
>> I was checking reviewers' bandwidth to review it. Unfortunately, I didn't 
>> receive
>> any comments except yours until now. That means this series has to miss 4.6. 
>> Please
>> pick/merge 41 and 42 if no body has objection. Thanks again for your time on 
>> this.
>
>Too late for 4.6.
>

Yeah, Sorry about that, Rob.

Thanks,
Gavin

_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev

Reply via email to