On Tue, 2016-03-29 at 16:26 +1100, Gavin Shan wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 12:51:50PM +1000, Russell Currey wrote:
<snip>
> >     /*
> >      * Necessary sanity check. We needn't check "get-config-addr-info"
> > @@ -93,8 +98,7 @@ static int pseries_eeh_init(void)
> >         (ibm_read_slot_reset_state2 == RTAS_UNKNOWN_SERVICE &&
> >          ibm_read_slot_reset_state == RTAS_UNKNOWN_SERVICE) ||
> >         ibm_slot_error_detail == RTAS_UNKNOWN_SERVICE       ||
> > -       (ibm_configure_pe == RTAS_UNKNOWN_SERVICE           &
> > &
> > -        ibm_configure_bridge == RTAS_UNKNOWN_SERVICE)) {
> > +       ibm_configure_pe == RTAS_UNKNOWN_SERVICE) {
> >             pr_info("EEH functionality not supported\n");
> >             return -EINVAL;
> >     }
> Since you're here, you can do similar thing to @ibm_read_slot_reset_state
> and @ibm_read_slot_reset_state?

Ah, didn't notice there was a similar thing going on there.  Will fix.
> 
> > 
> > @@ -621,18 +625,9 @@ static int pseries_eeh_configure_bridge(struct
> > eeh_pe *pe)
> >     if (pe->addr)
> >             config_addr = pe->addr;
> > 
> > -   /* Use new configure-pe function, if supported */
> > -   if (ibm_configure_pe != RTAS_UNKNOWN_SERVICE) {
> > -           ret = rtas_call(ibm_configure_pe, 3, 1, NULL,
> > -                           config_addr, BUID_HI(pe->phb->buid),
> > -                           BUID_LO(pe->phb->buid));
> > -   } else if (ibm_configure_bridge != RTAS_UNKNOWN_SERVICE) {
> > -           ret = rtas_call(ibm_configure_bridge, 3, 1, NULL,
> > -                           config_addr, BUID_HI(pe->phb->buid),
> > -                           BUID_LO(pe->phb->buid));
> > -   } else {
> > -           return -EFAULT;
> > -   }
> > +   ret = rtas_call(ibm_configure_pe, 3, 1, NULL,
> > +                   config_addr, BUID_HI(pe->phb->buid),
> > +                   BUID_LO(pe->phb->buid));
> > 
> Russell, it seems not working if "ibm,configure-pe" and "ibm,configure-
> bridge" are all
> missed from "/rtas".

If they're both missing, then the init should fail as ibm_configure_pe will
be RTAS_UNKNOWN_SERVICE, so this code should never be called.

>  Also, I don't think we need backport it to 3.10+ as it's not fixing
> any bugs if I'm correct enough.

This patch doesn't, but the second patch does.

> 
> Thanks,
> Gavin
> 
> 
> > 
> >     if (ret)
> >             pr_warn("%s: Unable to configure bridge PHB#%d-PE#%x
> > (%d)\n",

_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev

Reply via email to