On 22.03.2016 15:53, Laurent Vivier wrote:
> Until now, when we connect gdb to the QEMU gdb-server, the
> single-step mode is not managed.
>
> This patch adds this, only for kvm-pr:
>
> If KVM_GUESTDBG_SINGLESTEP is set, we enable single-step trace bit in the
> MSR (MSR_SE) just before the __kvmppc_vcpu_run(), and disable it just after.
> In kvmppc_handle_exit_pr, instead of routing the interrupt to
> the guest, we return to host, with KVM_EXIT_DEBUG reason.
>
> Signed-off-by: Laurent Vivier <lviv...@redhat.com>
> ---
> arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_pr.c | 31 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_pr.c b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_pr.c
> index 95bceca..e6896f4 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_pr.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_pr.c
> @@ -882,6 +882,24 @@ void kvmppc_set_fscr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 fscr)
> }
> #endif
>
> +static void kvmppc_setup_debug(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> +{
> + if (vcpu->guest_debug & KVM_GUESTDBG_SINGLESTEP) {
> + u64 msr = kvmppc_get_msr(vcpu);
> +
> + kvmppc_set_msr(vcpu, msr | MSR_SE);
> + }
> +}
> +
> +static void kvmppc_clear_debug(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> +{
> + if (vcpu->guest_debug & KVM_GUESTDBG_SINGLESTEP) {
> + u64 msr = kvmppc_get_msr(vcpu);
> +
> + kvmppc_set_msr(vcpu, msr & ~MSR_SE);
> + }
> +}
> +
> int kvmppc_handle_exit_pr(struct kvm_run *run, struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> unsigned int exit_nr)
> {
> @@ -1208,8 +1226,13 @@ program_interrupt:
> #endif
> case BOOK3S_INTERRUPT_MACHINE_CHECK:
> case BOOK3S_INTERRUPT_TRACE:
> - kvmppc_book3s_queue_irqprio(vcpu, exit_nr);
> - r = RESUME_GUEST;
> + if (vcpu->guest_debug & KVM_GUESTDBG_SINGLESTEP) {
> + run->exit_reason = KVM_EXIT_DEBUG;
> + r = RESUME_HOST;
> + } else {
> + kvmppc_book3s_queue_irqprio(vcpu, exit_nr);
> + r = RESUME_GUEST;
> + }
Should the new code rather be limited to the BOOK3S_INTERRUPT_TRACE case
only? I mean, this way, you never can deliver a machine check interrupt
to the guest if singlestep debugging is enabled on the host, can you?
Thomas
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
