On Mon, May 09, 2016 at 10:13:59AM +0100, Måns Rullgård wrote: > Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevche...@gmail.com> writes: > > > On Mon, May 9, 2016 at 4:09 AM, Tejun Heo <t...@kernel.org> wrote: > >> On Sun, May 08, 2016 at 04:00:08PM -0400, Tejun Heo wrote: > >>> Hello, Andy. > >>> > >>> On Wed, May 04, 2016 at 03:22:51PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > >>> > Tejun, since Vinod applied all necessary patches into his tree, the > >>> > series now has just a dependency to whatever branch / tag he marks for > >>> > it. > >>> > Do we have a chance to see the SATA series be applied in your tree? > >>> > >>> Applied 1-22 to libata/for-4.7. There was a couple trivial conflicts > >>> which I resolved while applying but it'd be great if you can check > >>> whether everything looks okay. > >>> > >>> https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/tj/libata.git/log/?h=for-4.7 > >> > >> Oops, build failure. Reverted for now. > > > > I suppose you have to pull material from Vinod. > > The failure the build bot reported is due to the DMA patches not being > in the tree.
Which tree should I pull? Thanks. -- tejun _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
