On Tue, 2016-05-24 at 10:04 +1000, Russell Currey wrote: > On Mon, 2016-05-23 at 03:12 -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote: > > On Mon, 23 May 2016, Russell Currey wrote: > > > On Sat, 2016-05-21 at 14:03 +0200, Andrea Gelmini wrote: > > > > Signed-off-by: Andrea Gelmini <andrea.gelm...@gelma.net> > > > > --- > > > > > > This entire comment needs to be rewritten as it's incredibly confusing, > > > but > > > alas > > > > > > Acked-by: Russell Currey <rus...@russell.cc> > > > > > > > arch/powerpc/include/asm/eeh.h | 2 +- > > > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > > > > > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/eeh.h > > > > b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/eeh.h > > > > index fb9f376..7d34f3d 100644 > > > > --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/eeh.h > > > > +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/eeh.h > > > > @@ -57,7 +57,7 @@ struct pci_dn; > > > > /* > > > > * The struct is used to trace PE related EEH functionality. > > > > * In theory, there will have one instance of the struct to > > > > "there will have one instance"? > > See "This entire comment needs to be rewritten as it's incredibly confusing" > :) > > EEH documentation, both in source and in Documentation/powerpc/, is very much > in > need of updates and reworks. I'm working on it.
Thanks. I'll wait for that, I'm not interested in merging a single byte typo fix to an otherwise badly worded comment. cheers _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev