On Wed, Jan 02, 2008 at 07:46:40PM -0600, Josh Boyer wrote: > On Wed, 2 Jan 2008 17:07:50 -0700 > "Mark A. Greer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > From: Mark A. Greer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > Fix error in booting-without-of.txt that indicates that a node can inherit > > its #address-cells and #size-cells definitions from its parent's parent. > > This is not correct and the latest dtc enforces it. > > I'm lazy so I haven't checked myself, but by "latest dtc" does that > mean the DTC that's in the kernel now? > > Things are going to be fun when we start saying generic things like > "latest DTC". And when upstream DTC gets new features or enforcements, > we'll have to have all the in-kernel DTS files patched up when that > version of DTC gets merged in-kernel. Just something to keep in mind > as we move along.
Yeah, I thought about that last night, actually. I think I'll just change that sentence to "This is not correct." Avoid the issue :) Mark _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
