On Fri, Jul 15, 2016 at 09:09:55AM -0400, Vivek Goyal wrote: > On Tue, Jul 12, 2016 at 10:42:01AM +0900, AKASHI Takahiro wrote: > > [..] > > -SYSCALL_DEFINE5(kexec_file_load, int, kernel_fd, int, initrd_fd, > > +SYSCALL_DEFINE6(kexec_file_load, int, kernel_fd, int, initrd_fd, > > unsigned long, cmdline_len, const char __user *, cmdline_ptr, > > - unsigned long, flags) > > + unsigned long, flags, const struct kexec_fdset __user *, ufdset) > > Can one add more parameters to existing syscall. Can it break existing > programs with new kernel? I was of the impression that one can't do that. > But may be I am missing something.
I think the idea was that we would only look at the new params if a new flags was set, and otherwise it would behave as the old syscall. Regardless, I think it makes far more sense to add a kexec_file_load2 syscall if we're going to modify the prototype at all. It's a rather different proposition to the existing syscall, and needs to be treated as such. Thanks, Mark. _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
