On Wed, 13 Jul 2016 15:10:49 +0530
"Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.ku...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:

> We also handle fault with proper stack initialized. This enable us to
> callout to C in fault handling routines. We don't do this for kernel
> mapping, because of the possibility of taking recursive fault if
> kernel stack in not yet mapped by an slb entry.
> 
> This enable us to handle Power9 slb fault better. We will add bolted
> entries for the entire kernel mapping in segment table and user slb
> entries we take fault and insert on demand. With translation on, we
> should be able to access segment table from fault handler.

What does this cost on P8? Is that a problem? Might need to do
feature bits.

> Signed-off-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.ku...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> ---
>  arch/powerpc/kernel/exceptions-64s.S | 55
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
> arch/powerpc/mm/slb.c                | 11 ++++++++ 2 files changed,
> 61 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/exceptions-64s.S
> b/arch/powerpc/kernel/exceptions-64s.S index
> 2747e901fb99..2132bf55573c 100644 ---
> a/arch/powerpc/kernel/exceptions-64s.S +++
> b/arch/powerpc/kernel/exceptions-64s.S @@ -794,7 +794,7 @@
> data_access_slb_relon_pSeries: mfspr  r3,SPRN_DAR
>       mfspr   r12,SPRN_SRR1
>  #ifndef CONFIG_RELOCATABLE
> -     b       slb_miss_realmode
> +     b       handle_slb_miss_relon
>  #else
>       /*
>        * We can't just use a direct branch to slb_miss_realmode
> @@ -803,7 +803,7 @@ data_access_slb_relon_pSeries:
>        */
>       mfctr   r11
>       ld      r10,PACAKBASE(r13)
> -     LOAD_HANDLER(r10, slb_miss_realmode)
> +     LOAD_HANDLER(r10, handle_slb_miss_relon)
>       mtctr   r10
>       bctr
>  #endif
> @@ -819,11 +819,11 @@ instruction_access_slb_relon_pSeries:
>       mfspr   r3,SPRN_SRR0            /* SRR0 is faulting
> address */ mfspr      r12,SPRN_SRR1
>  #ifndef CONFIG_RELOCATABLE
> -     b       slb_miss_realmode
> +     b       handle_slb_miss_relon
>  #else
>       mfctr   r11
>       ld      r10,PACAKBASE(r13)
> -     LOAD_HANDLER(r10, slb_miss_realmode)
> +     LOAD_HANDLER(r10, handle_slb_miss_relon)
>       mtctr   r10
>       bctr
>  #endif
> @@ -961,7 +961,23 @@ h_data_storage_common:
>       bl      unknown_exception
>       b       ret_from_except
>  
> +/* r3 point to DAR */
>       .align  7
> +     .globl slb_miss_user
> +slb_miss_user:
> +     std     r3,PACA_EXSLB+EX_DAR(r13)
> +     /* Restore r3 as expected by PROLOG_COMMON below */
> +     ld      r3,PACA_EXSLB+EX_R3(r13)
> +     EXCEPTION_PROLOG_COMMON(0x380, PACA_EXSLB)
> +     RECONCILE_IRQ_STATE(r10, r11)
> +     ld      r4,PACA_EXSLB+EX_DAR(r13)
> +     li      r5,0x380
> +     std     r4,_DAR(r1)
> +     addi    r3,r1,STACK_FRAME_OVERHEAD
> +     bl      handle_slb_miss
> +     b       ret_from_except_lite
> +
> +        .align       7
>       .globl instruction_access_common
>  instruction_access_common:
>       EXCEPTION_PROLOG_COMMON(0x400, PACA_EXGEN)
> @@ -1379,11 +1395,17 @@ unrecover_mce:
>   * We assume we aren't going to take any exceptions during this
> procedure. */
>  slb_miss_realmode:
> -     mflr    r10
>  #ifdef CONFIG_RELOCATABLE
>       mtctr   r11
>  #endif
> +     /*
> +      * Handle user slb miss with translation enabled
> +      */
> +     cmpdi   r3,0
> +     bge     3f
>  
> +slb_miss_kernel:
> +     mflr    r10
>       stw     r9,PACA_EXSLB+EX_CCR(r13)       /* save CR in
> exc. frame */ std     r10,PACA_EXSLB+EX_LR(r13)       /* save LR
> */ 
> @@ -1429,6 +1451,29 @@
> ALT_MMU_FTR_SECTION_END_IFCLR(MMU_FTR_TYPE_RADIX) mtspr
> SPRN_SRR1,r10 rfid
>       b       .
> +3:
> +     /*
> +      * Enable IR/DR and handle the fault
> +      */
> +     EXCEPTION_PROLOG_PSERIES_1(slb_miss_user, EXC_STD)
> +     /*
> +      * handler with relocation on
> +      */
> +handle_slb_miss_relon:
> +#ifdef CONFIG_RELOCATABLE
> +     mtctr   r11
> +#endif

This is turning into a bit of spaghetti. I think it can be
improved though.

I have a patch that I think can save a few instructions in the
relocatable case for SLB miss. I think that may give enough space
inline to branch to the correct handler. I should submit it soon.


> +     /*
> +      * Handle user slb miss with stack initialized.
> +      */
> +     cmpdi   r3,0
> +     bge     4f
> +     /*
> +      * go back to slb_miss_realmode
> +      */

Are these comments adding much? I think if the names of some of the
labels was improved, you might find they're not necessary. Some
existing labels like slb_miss_realmode don't help too much either. That
handler runs in real and virtual mode, and now the realmode exception
can go elsewhere too.


> +     b       slb_miss_kernel

blt    slb_miss_kernel?


> +4:
> +     EXCEPTION_RELON_PROLOG_PSERIES_1(slb_miss_user, EXC_STD)

_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev

Reply via email to