On Tue, 08 Jan 2008 22:35:36 -0800 Geoff Levand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> +int ps3_repository_read_num_pu(unsigned int *num_pu)
> +{
> + int result;
> + u64 v1;
> +
> + v1 = 0;
> + result = read_node(PS3_LPAR_ID_CURRENT,
> + make_first_field("bi", 0),
> + make_field("pun", 0),
> + 0, 0,
> + &v1, NULL);
> + *num_pu = v1;
Why not just pass "num_pu" instead of &v1 to read_node()?
> +int ps3_repository_read_pu_id(unsigned int pu_index, u64 *pu_id)
> +{
> + int result;
> + u64 v1;
> +
> + v1 = 0;
> + result = read_node(PS3_LPAR_ID_CURRENT,
> + make_first_field("bi", 0),
> + make_field("pu", pu_index),
> + 0, 0,
> + &v1, NULL);
> + *pu_id = v1;
Similarly with "pu_id"?
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/
pgpLlaxb4kuew.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
