On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 2:44 PM, Gautham R Shenoy <e...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote: > On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 03:17:33PM +0530, Balbir Singh wrote: >> On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 02:37:01PM +0530, Gautham R. Shenoy wrote: >> > From: "Gautham R. Shenoy" <e...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> >> > >> > Balbir pointed out that in idle_book3s.S and powernv/idle.c some >> > functions and variables had power9 in their names while some others >> > had arch300. >> > >> >> I would prefer power9 to arch300 >> > > > I don't have a strong preference for arch300 vs power9, will change it > to power9 if that looks better.
Personally I think we should be as descriptive as possible and use power_9_arch_300_the_bikeshed_is_red_dammit. Oliver