Kumar Gala wrote: >> Why go out of our way to fail on a childless soc node? > > do we see any case in which we'd have a childless soc node?
It's possible that it could be used to communicate immrbase and soc type, but nothing else. Not overly likely, but possible. > I'm just concerned about make sure this works for all the various cases > of #address-cells and #size-cells. It should. We check the soc's #address-cells to skip the child bus address, and of_translate_address should take care of looking up the parent #address-cells. The size portion of the ranges is ignored. -Scott _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
