On 2017/02/28 09:11AM, Steven Rostedt wrote: > On Tue, 28 Feb 2017 15:04:15 +1100 > Michael Ellerman <m...@ellerman.id.au> wrote: > > kernel/trace/ftrace.c more obvious. > > > > I don't know if it's really worth keeping the names the same across > > arches, especially as we already have: > > > > arch/arm64/kernel/entry-ftrace.S > > arch/arm/kernel/entry-ftrace.S > > arch/blackfin/kernel/ftrace-entry.S > > arch/metag/kernel/ftrace_stub.S > > > > But we can rename it if you feel strongly about it. > > Hmm, perhaps "entry-ftrace.S" would be the better name. I never liked > the "mcount.S" name.
Ok, just to be sure I get this right -- do you want me to name the powerpc files entry_ftrace_64.S (and subsequently to a slightly long entry_ftrace_64_mprofile.S), or rename the x86 mcount* files? Or both? Thanks for the review, - Naveen
