In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > Olof Johansson wrote: > ... > > > > I disagree, I have one defconfig for all our boards to date. It means I > > only have one kernel to build to test on all boards, instead of having > > to build a number of different kernels. Keeping it fairly generic also > > means a customer can start out using the generic kernel in case they > > want to, and later on add their own drivers and prune out what is not > > needed. > > Well, I just prefer separate defconfigs but I can live with the common > one as well, feel free to merge it as you see it fit.
Well, it may make sense to use common defconfig files for boards of the same breed (different configurations of one board family from one vendor for example). But please note that TQM5200, CM5200 and Motion-PRO are boards from 3 different vendors, used by different projects with differing needs. IMO it makes very much sense to provide 3 separate default configurations that match the specific requirements of each of these boards. In this case I vote for separate defconfig files, please. Best regards, Wolfgang Denk -- DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Be careful what you wish for. You never know who will be listening. - Terry Pratchett, _Soul Music_ _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev