On Sat, Jan 26, 2008 at 04:15:52PM +1100, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > > Michel, > > You had reported that commit 810e95ccd58d91369191aa4ecc9e6d4a10d8d0c8 > > was the cause for this bad behavior. Do you see behavior change (from > > good->bad) > > immediately after applying that patch during your bisect process? > > Also Michel, double check your .config in both cases.
And also Michel whether CONFIG_FAIR_GROUP_SCHED + CONFIG_FAIR_CGROUP_SCHED gives more or less same desktop exp as !CONFIG_FAIR_GROUP_SCHED pls! > > I would prefer to have CONFIG_FAIR_GROUP_SCHED + > > CONFIG_FAIR_CGROUP_SCHED on by default. Can you pls let me know how you > > think is the desktop experience with that combination? > > I'm going to give that a try but unfortunately, it will have to wait > until I'm back from LCA in a bit more than a week. -- Regards, vatsa _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev