On Mon, Feb 11, 2008 at 11:47:50AM +0100, Jan-Bernd Themann wrote: > On Monday 11 February 2008 11:12, Dave Hansen wrote: > > On Mon, 2008-02-11 at 10:49 +0100, Jan-Bernd Themann wrote: > > > are you the right person to address this patch to? > > > > You might want to check the top of the file. ;) > > > > > --- a/drivers/base/memory.c > > > +++ b/drivers/base/memory.c > > > @@ -52,11 +52,13 @@ int register_memory_notifier(struct notifier_block > > > *nb) > > > { > > > return blocking_notifier_chain_register(&memory_chain, nb); > > > } > > > +EXPORT_SYMBOL(register_memory_notifier); > > > > > > void unregister_memory_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb) > > > { > > > blocking_notifier_chain_unregister(&memory_chain, nb); > > > } > > > +EXPORT_SYMBOL(unregister_memory_notifier); > > > > Is there a particular reason these can't be GPL? > > > > I don't object to make them GPL. Greg, what do you think?
They should be _GPL to match the rest of the driver core. Care to resend this? thanks, greg k-h _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev