On Tue, 3 Jul 2018 08:08:14 +1000
"Nicholas Piggin" <npig...@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Mon, 02 Jul 2018 11:17:06 +0530
> Mahesh J Salgaonkar <mah...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> 
> > From: Mahesh Salgaonkar <mah...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> > 
> > On pseries, as of today system crashes if we get a machine check
> > exceptions due to SLB errors. These are soft errors and can be
> > fixed by flushing the SLBs so the kernel can continue to function
> > instead of system crash. We do this in real mode before turning on
> > MMU. Otherwise we would run into nested machine checks. This patch
> > now fetches the rtas error log in real mode and flushes the SLBs on
> > SLB errors.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Mahesh Salgaonkar <mah...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> > ---
> >  arch/powerpc/include/asm/book3s/64/mmu-hash.h |    1 
> >  arch/powerpc/include/asm/machdep.h            |    1 
> >  arch/powerpc/kernel/exceptions-64s.S          |   42
> > +++++++++++++++++++++ arch/powerpc/kernel/mce.c
> > |   16 +++++++- arch/powerpc/mm/slb.c                         |
> > 6 +++ arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/opal.c         |    1 
> >  arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/pseries.h      |    1 
> >  arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/ras.c          |   51
> > +++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/setup.c        |    1 9 files
> > changed, 116 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) 
> 
> 
> > +TRAMP_REAL_BEGIN(machine_check_pSeries_early)
> > +BEGIN_FTR_SECTION
> > +   EXCEPTION_PROLOG_1(PACA_EXMC, NOTEST, 0x200)
> > +   mr      r10,r1                  /* Save r1 */
> > +   ld      r1,PACAMCEMERGSP(r13)   /* Use MC emergency
> > stack */
> > +   subi    r1,r1,INT_FRAME_SIZE    /* alloc stack
> > frame               */
> > +   mfspr   r11,SPRN_SRR0           /* Save SRR0 */
> > +   mfspr   r12,SPRN_SRR1           /* Save SRR1 */
> > +   EXCEPTION_PROLOG_COMMON_1()
> > +   EXCEPTION_PROLOG_COMMON_2(PACA_EXMC)
> > +   EXCEPTION_PROLOG_COMMON_3(0x200)
> > +   addi    r3,r1,STACK_FRAME_OVERHEAD
> > +   BRANCH_LINK_TO_FAR(machine_check_early) /* Function call
> > ABI */  
> 
> Is there any reason you can't use the existing
> machine_check_powernv_early code to do all this?
> 
> > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/mce.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/mce.c
> > index efdd16a79075..221271c96a57 100644
> > --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/mce.c
> > +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/mce.c
> > @@ -488,9 +488,21 @@ long machine_check_early(struct pt_regs *regs)
> >  {
> >     long handled = 0;
> >  
> > -   __this_cpu_inc(irq_stat.mce_exceptions);
> > +   /*
> > +    * For pSeries we count mce when we go into virtual mode
> > machine
> > +    * check handler. Hence skip it. Also, We can't access per
> > cpu
> > +    * variables in real mode for LPAR.
> > +    */
> > +   if (early_cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_HVMODE))
> > +           __this_cpu_inc(irq_stat.mce_exceptions);
> >  
> > -   if (cur_cpu_spec && cur_cpu_spec->machine_check_early)
> > +   /*
> > +    * See if platform is capable of handling machine check.
> > +    * Otherwise fallthrough and allow CPU to handle this
> > machine check.
> > +    */
> > +   if (ppc_md.machine_check_early)
> > +           handled = ppc_md.machine_check_early(regs);
> > +   else if (cur_cpu_spec && cur_cpu_spec->machine_check_early)
> >             handled =
> > cur_cpu_spec->machine_check_early(regs);  
> 
> Would be good to add a powernv ppc_md handler which does the
> cur_cpu_spec->machine_check_early() call now that other platforms are
> calling this code. Because those aren't valid as a fallback call, but
> specific to powernv.
> 

Something like this (untested)?

Subject: [PATCH] powerpc/powernv: define platform MCE handler.

---
 arch/powerpc/kernel/mce.c              |  3 ---
 arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/setup.c | 11 +++++++++++
 2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/mce.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/mce.c
index 221271c96a57..ae17d8aa60c4 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/mce.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/mce.c
@@ -498,12 +498,9 @@ long machine_check_early(struct pt_regs *regs)
 
        /*
         * See if platform is capable of handling machine check.
-        * Otherwise fallthrough and allow CPU to handle this machine check.
         */
        if (ppc_md.machine_check_early)
                handled = ppc_md.machine_check_early(regs);
-       else if (cur_cpu_spec && cur_cpu_spec->machine_check_early)
-               handled = cur_cpu_spec->machine_check_early(regs);
        return handled;
 }
 
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/setup.c 
b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/setup.c
index f96df0a25d05..b74c93bc2e55 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/setup.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/setup.c
@@ -431,6 +431,16 @@ static unsigned long pnv_get_proc_freq(unsigned int cpu)
        return ret_freq;
 }
 
+static long pnv_machine_check_early(struct pt_regs *regs)
+{
+       long handled = 0;
+
+       if (cur_cpu_spec && cur_cpu_spec->machine_check_early)
+               handled = cur_cpu_spec->machine_check_early(regs);
+
+       return handled;
+}
+
 define_machine(powernv) {
        .name                   = "PowerNV",
        .probe                  = pnv_probe,
@@ -442,6 +452,7 @@ define_machine(powernv) {
        .machine_shutdown       = pnv_shutdown,
        .power_save             = NULL,
        .calibrate_decr         = generic_calibrate_decr,
+       .machine_check_early    = pnv_machine_check_early,
 #ifdef CONFIG_KEXEC_CORE
        .kexec_cpu_down         = pnv_kexec_cpu_down,
 #endif
-- 
2.13.7

Reply via email to