On Fri, 14 Sep 2018 11:03:38 -0700 Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulni...@google.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 13, 2018 at 9:07 PM Joel Stanley <j...@jms.id.au> wrote: > > Last time this was proposed there was an issue reported: > > > > https://lists.ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-dev/2014-September/121214.html > > > > Heh, did PASemi sell boxes? Interesting, I'll have to read up on my history. > > On Thu, Sep 13, 2018 at 10:06 PM Nicholas Piggin <npig...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I don't think we can remove it completely because up to at least 4.6 > > maybe 4.8 has problems. > > > > I have a few patches lying around I started looking at this... I'll > > send them. > > Yeah, it's too bad the link above doesn't mention gcc version. > > The gcc bugreport mentions fixing the bug in > 7563dc64585324f443f5ac107eb6d89ee813a2d2, not sure how to check what > release version of gcc that is? (Do they tag releases?) I'm not sure, that's not in my gcc tree AFAIKS. > > Nick, do you have a test case or more context about this still being > an issue in gcc 4.8? (maybe I should wait for your patch series?) Sorry I forgot to cc you. This has links to some of the sched epilog bugs. https://marc.info/?l=linuxppc-embedded&m=153690223909654&w=2 Thanks, Nick
