Arnd Bergmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wednesday 05 March 2008, Ishizaki Kou wrote: > > This patch moves the base code for celleb support into platforms/cell/. > > All files in this patch are used by celleb-beat and celleb-native commonly. > > Moving around the files this way is good, but > > > +++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/cell/Makefile 2008-03-04 > > 14:00:28.000000000 +0900 > > @@ -26,3 +26,20 @@ > > ? spufs/ > > > > obj-$(CONFIG_PCI_MSI) += axon_msi.o > > + > > + > > +# celleb stuff > > +ifeq ($(CONFIG_PPC_CELLEB),y) > > +obj-y += celleb_setup.o \ > > + celleb_pci.o celleb_scc_epci.o \ > > + celleb_scc_pciex.o \ > > + celleb_scc_uhc.o \ > > + beat.o beat_htab.o beat_hvCall.o > > \ > > + beat_interrupt.o beat_iommu.o \ > > + io-workarounds.o spider-pci.o > > + > > +obj-$(CONFIG_SMP) += beat_smp.o > > +obj-$(CONFIG_PPC_UDBG_BEAT) += beat_udbg.o > > +obj-$(CONFIG_SERIAL_TXX9) += celleb_scc_sio.o > > +obj-$(CONFIG_SPU_BASE) += beat_spu_priv1.o > > +endif > > This looks like you are referencing files in the Makefile that are moved > in the later patches. In order to make the git-bisect work correctly > on the kernel after the patches are applied, I'd suggest either moving > all files at once, or to modify the Makefile in every step of the way > so that the kernel still builds.
Thanks for your advice. I'll split changing the Makefile because the moving patches is too large to be one patch. Best regards, Kou Ishizaki _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
