On Thu, 2008-04-03 at 14:35 +0200, Stefan Roese wrote: > On Thursday 03 April 2008, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > > On Thu, 2008-04-03 at 13:45 +0200, Stefan Roese wrote: > > > On some 4xx PPC's (e.g. 460EX/GT), the rx channel number is a multiple > > > of 8 (e.g. 8 for EMAC1, 16 for EMAC2), but enabling in MAL_RXCASR needs > > > the divided by 8 value for the bitmask. > > > > Sounds ok, but I wonder if we ever have a MAL with more than 8 chans, do > > we need to make this shift conditional to some device tree prop ? > > I suggest we postpone such a conditional setup until we see such a MAL. OK?
Agreed. I got a bit carried away.. Ben. _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list [email protected] https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
