On Mon, 19 Aug 2019 11:51:17 +1000
Alexey Kardashevskiy <a...@ozlabs.ru> wrote:

> The @tcegrp variable is used in 1) a loop over attached groups
> 2) it stores a pointer to a newly allocated tce_iommu_group if 1) found
> nothing. However the error handler does not distinguish how we got there
> and incorrectly releases memory for a found+incompatible group.
> 
> This fixes it by adding another error handling case.
> 
> Fixes: 0bd971676e68 ("powerpc/powernv/npu: Add compound IOMMU groups")
> Signed-off-by: Alexey Kardashevskiy <a...@ozlabs.ru>
> ---

Applied to vfio next branch with Paul's R-b.  Thanks,

Alex

> 
> The bug is there since 2157e7b82f3b but it would not appear in practice
> before 0bd971676e68, hence that "Fixes". Or it still should be
> 157e7b82f3b ("vfio: powerpc/spapr: Register memory and define IOMMU v2")
> ?
> 
> Found it when tried adding a "compound PE" (GPU + NPUs) to a container
> with a passed through xHCI host. The compatibility test (->create_table
> should be equal) treats them as incompatible which might a bug (or
> we are just suboptimal here) on its own.
> 
> ---
>  drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_spapr_tce.c | 9 +++++----
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_spapr_tce.c 
> b/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_spapr_tce.c
> index 8ce9ad21129f..babef8b00daf 100644
> --- a/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_spapr_tce.c
> +++ b/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_spapr_tce.c
> @@ -1234,7 +1234,7 @@ static long tce_iommu_take_ownership_ddw(struct 
> tce_container *container,
>  static int tce_iommu_attach_group(void *iommu_data,
>               struct iommu_group *iommu_group)
>  {
> -     int ret;
> +     int ret = 0;
>       struct tce_container *container = iommu_data;
>       struct iommu_table_group *table_group;
>       struct tce_iommu_group *tcegrp = NULL;
> @@ -1287,13 +1287,13 @@ static int tce_iommu_attach_group(void *iommu_data,
>                       !table_group->ops->release_ownership) {
>               if (container->v2) {
>                       ret = -EPERM;
> -                     goto unlock_exit;
> +                     goto free_exit;
>               }
>               ret = tce_iommu_take_ownership(container, table_group);
>       } else {
>               if (!container->v2) {
>                       ret = -EPERM;
> -                     goto unlock_exit;
> +                     goto free_exit;
>               }
>               ret = tce_iommu_take_ownership_ddw(container, table_group);
>               if (!tce_groups_attached(container) && !container->tables[0])
> @@ -1305,10 +1305,11 @@ static int tce_iommu_attach_group(void *iommu_data,
>               list_add(&tcegrp->next, &container->group_list);
>       }
>  
> -unlock_exit:
> +free_exit:
>       if (ret && tcegrp)
>               kfree(tcegrp);
>  
> +unlock_exit:
>       mutex_unlock(&container->lock);
>  
>       return ret;

Reply via email to