On 26/11/19 18:52, Leonardo Bras wrote:
> Fixes a possible 'use after free' of kvm variable.
> It does use mutex_unlock(&kvm->lock) after possible freeing a variable
> with kvm_put_kvm(kvm).
> 
> Signed-off-by: Leonardo Bras <leona...@linux.ibm.com>
> ---
>  arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_64_vio.c | 3 +--
>  virt/kvm/kvm_main.c              | 8 ++++----
>  2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_64_vio.c 
> b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_64_vio.c
> index 5834db0a54c6..a402ead833b6 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_64_vio.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_64_vio.c
> @@ -316,14 +316,13 @@ long kvm_vm_ioctl_create_spapr_tce(struct kvm *kvm,
>  
>       if (ret >= 0)
>               list_add_rcu(&stt->list, &kvm->arch.spapr_tce_tables);
> -     else
> -             kvm_put_kvm(kvm);
>  
>       mutex_unlock(&kvm->lock);
>  
>       if (ret >= 0)
>               return ret;
>  
> +     kvm_put_kvm(kvm);
>       kfree(stt);
>   fail_acct:
>       account_locked_vm(current->mm, kvmppc_stt_pages(npages), false);

This part is a good change, as it makes the code clearer.  The
virt/kvm/kvm_main.c bits, however, are not necessary as explained by Sean.

Paolo

> diff --git a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
> index 13efc291b1c7..f37089b60d09 100644
> --- a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
> +++ b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
> @@ -2744,10 +2744,8 @@ static int kvm_vm_ioctl_create_vcpu(struct kvm *kvm, 
> u32 id)
>       /* Now it's all set up, let userspace reach it */
>       kvm_get_kvm(kvm);
>       r = create_vcpu_fd(vcpu);
> -     if (r < 0) {
> -             kvm_put_kvm(kvm);
> +     if (r < 0)
>               goto unlock_vcpu_destroy;
> -     }
>  
>       kvm->vcpus[atomic_read(&kvm->online_vcpus)] = vcpu;
>  
> @@ -2771,6 +2769,8 @@ static int kvm_vm_ioctl_create_vcpu(struct kvm *kvm, 
> u32 id)
>       mutex_lock(&kvm->lock);
>       kvm->created_vcpus--;
>       mutex_unlock(&kvm->lock);
> +     if (r < 0)
> +             kvm_put_kvm(kvm);
>       return r;
>  }
>  
> @@ -3183,10 +3183,10 @@ static int kvm_ioctl_create_device(struct kvm *kvm,
>       kvm_get_kvm(kvm);
>       ret = anon_inode_getfd(ops->name, &kvm_device_fops, dev, O_RDWR | 
> O_CLOEXEC);
>       if (ret < 0) {
> -             kvm_put_kvm(kvm);
>               mutex_lock(&kvm->lock);
>               list_del(&dev->vm_node);
>               mutex_unlock(&kvm->lock);
> +             kvm_put_kvm(kvm);
>               ops->destroy(dev);
>               return ret;
>       }
> 

Reply via email to