> -----Original Message----- > From: Timur Tabi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: den 16 april 2008 23:16 > To: Joakim Tjernlund > Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org > Subject: Re: lseek() on entries in /proc/device-tree returns EINVAL > > Joakim Tjernlund wrote: > > > Good, bb should probably do the same. I just hope Al will allow a grace > > period and restore > > the old behavior so bb can catch up. > > I don't see any reason why lseek() should not always work. Besides, a "grace > period" would mean that on some future kernel, older busybox will not work.
Sure, but better a grace period than none at all. Currently no bb works but with a grace period you can at least tell users to upgrade bb when the grace period is over. Jocke _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
