Anton Vorontsov wrote: > What is the problem with returning (int)(u32 & u32) value?
Technically, a signed int is smaller than an unsigned int, so a value of 0x80000000 won't fit in an 'int'. > You've asked to remove "!!" stuff and now purposing exactly the > same... :-? The !! stuff was because the function was returning a boolean value, so non-zero == TRUE. I don't think the return value from 'get' is a technically a boolean, so I'm assuming that the spec says the return value should be 0 or 1, to reflect the value of that GPIO pin. -- Timur Tabi Linux kernel developer at Freescale _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
