Yes, but this is a symptom of a separate problem, which is that it is sometimes valuable to generate an optimized kernel configuration for a particular FPGA system. First order, I'm more concerned about getting a kernel which is generic and can work with (more or less) any device tree.
Steve > -----Original Message----- > From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, May 05, 2008 5:12 PM > To: Stephen Neuendorffer > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org > Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] [POWERPC] Xilinx: Virtex: Enable dcr for MMIO andNATIVE > > > On Mon, 2008-05-05 at 10:56 -0700, Stephen Neuendorffer wrote: > > FPGA designs may have need of both MMIO-based and NATIVE-based dcr > > interfaces. > > You say _may_ ... wouldn't it be better if it was thus left to a given > virtex based platform to enable DCR_MMIO if it uses it and leave only > NATIVE by default ? > > > Signed-off-by: Stephen Neuendorffer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > --- > > arch/powerpc/platforms/40x/Kconfig | 2 ++ > > 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/40x/Kconfig b/arch/powerpc/platforms/40x/Kconfig > > index a9260e2..b8e06df 100644 > > --- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/40x/Kconfig > > +++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/40x/Kconfig > > @@ -123,6 +123,8 @@ config 405GPR > > > > config XILINX_VIRTEX > > bool > > + select PPC_DCR_MMIO > > + select PPC_DCR_NATIVE > > > > config XILINX_VIRTEX_II_PRO > > bool > _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
