On Mon, May 5, 2008 at 11:59 AM, Stephen Neuendorffer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Signed-off-by: Stephen Neuendorffer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > --- > drivers/video/xilinxfb.c | 1 + > 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/video/xilinxfb.c b/drivers/video/xilinxfb.c > index 848752e..a82c530 100644 > --- a/drivers/video/xilinxfb.c > +++ b/drivers/video/xilinxfb.c > @@ -396,6 +396,7 @@ static int __devexit xilinxfb_of_remove(struct of_device > *op) > /* Match table for of_platform binding */ > static struct of_device_id xilinxfb_of_match[] __devinitdata = { > { .compatible = "xlnx,plb-tft-cntlr-ref-1.00.a", }, > + { .compatible = "xlnx,plb-dvi-cntlr-ref-1.00.c", },
Can you get the dvi core to claim compatibility with the tft core (assuming it is register level backwards compatible)? Cheers, g. -- Grant Likely, B.Sc., P.Eng. Secret Lab Technologies Ltd. _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev