On Wed, 14 Oct 2020 08:45:16 +0530 "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.ku...@linux.ibm.com> wrote:
> > Against mm-debug_vm_pgtable-avoid-none-pte-in-pte_clear_test.patch: > > > > https://lkml.kernel.org/r/87zh5wx51b....@linux.ibm.com > > > yes this one we should get fixed. I was hoping someone familiar with > Riscv pte updates rules would pitch in. IIUC we need to update > RANDON_ORVALUE similar to how we updated it for s390 and ppc64. > > > Alternatively we can do this > > modified mm/debug_vm_pgtable.c > @@ -548,7 +548,7 @@ static void __init pte_clear_tests(struct mm_struct > *mm, pte_t *ptep, > pte_t pte = pfn_pte(pfn, prot); > > pr_debug("Validating PTE clear\n"); > - pte = __pte(pte_val(pte) | RANDOM_ORVALUE); > +// pte = __pte(pte_val(pte) | RANDOM_ORVALUE); > set_pte_at(mm, vaddr, ptep, pte); > barrier(); > pte_clear(mm, vaddr, ptep); > > till we get that feedback from RiscV team? Would it be better to do #ifdef CONFIG_S390 pte = __pte(pte_val(pte) | RANDOM_ORVALUE); #endif ?
