On Fri, 30 May 2008, Haavard Skinnemoen wrote: > Maybe we need another interface that does not do byteswapping but > provides stronger ordering guarantees?
The byte swapping depends on the device/bus. So what happened to the old idea of putting the accessor function pointers in the device/bus structure? Gr{oetje,eeting}s, Geert -- Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that. -- Linus Torvalds _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev