On 4/22/21 2:19 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> When the user specified an explicit swiotlb size on the command line,
> the achitecture code should not override it.
>
> Fixes: 2cbc2776efe4 ("swiotlb: remove swiotlb_nr_tbl")
> Reported-by: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lenda...@amd.com>
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <h...@lst.de>
I tested this patchset and I'm not able to get the override via the
command line or via the SEV adjustment function. Looking at the code,
swiotlb_default_size is initialized, so the call to swiotlb_adjust_size()
always returns without setting the new size.
Thanks,
Tom
> ---
> kernel/dma/swiotlb.c | 6 +++++-
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/dma/swiotlb.c b/kernel/dma/swiotlb.c
> index 87d06ddf4753f3..aef02a3825b494 100644
> --- a/kernel/dma/swiotlb.c
> +++ b/kernel/dma/swiotlb.c
> @@ -106,7 +106,9 @@ void swiotlb_set_max_segment(unsigned int val)
>
> unsigned long swiotlb_size_or_default(void)
> {
> - return swiotlb_default_size;
> + if (swiotlb_default_size)
> + return swiotlb_default_size;
> + return IO_TLB_DEFAULT_SIZE;
> }
>
> void __init swiotlb_adjust_size(unsigned long size)
> @@ -116,6 +118,8 @@ void __init swiotlb_adjust_size(unsigned long size)
> * architectures such as those supporting memory encryption to
> * adjust/expand SWIOTLB size for their use.
> */
> + if (swiotlb_default_size)
> + return;
> swiotlb_default_size = ALIGN(size, IO_TLB_SEGSIZE << IO_TLB_SHIFT);
> pr_info("SWIOTLB bounce buffer size adjusted to %luMB",
> swiotlb_default_size >> 20);
>
