Heiko Carstens <h...@linux.ibm.com> writes: > So, the in both variants s390 provides nearly identical data. The only > difference is that for FL_SAVE_REGS the program status word mask is > missing; therefore it is not possible to figure out the condition code > or if interrupts were enabled/disabled. > > Vasily, Sven, I think we have two options here: > > - don't provide sane psw mask contents at all and say (again) that > ptregs contents are identical > > - provide (finally) a full psw mask contents using epsw, and indicate > validity with a flags bit in pt_regs > > I would vote for the second option, even though epsw is slow. But this > is about the third or fourth time this came up in different > contexts. So I'd guess we should go for the slow but complete > solution. Opinions?
Given that this only affects ftrace_regs_caller, i would also vote for the second option.
