Because get_immrbase in fsl_soc.c does not work without it.
On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 7:42 PM, David Gibson
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 02:24:46PM -0600, John Rigby wrote:
>> Updated device tree for MPC5121ADS
>
> [snip]
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] {
>> compatible = "fsl,mpc5121-immr";
>> + device_type = "soc";
>
> I realise we still need the unwanted device_type value on the soc in
> some cases for backwards compatibility, but why are you adding it
> where it wasn't before..?
>
> --
> David Gibson | I'll have my music baroque, and my code
> david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au | minimalist, thank you. NOT _the_ _other_
> | _way_ _around_!
> http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson
> _______________________________________________
> Linuxppc-dev mailing list
> Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
> https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
>
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
