arndb.de>, ulli.kr...@googlemail.com, vgu...@kernel.org, 
linux-...@vger.kernel.org, j...@joshtriplett.org, rost...@goodmis.org, 
r...@vger.kernel.org, b...@alien8.de, bc...@quicinc.com, 
tsbog...@alpha.franken.de, linux-par...@vger.kernel.org, sudeep.ho...@arm.com, 
shawn...@kernel.org, da...@davemloft.net, dal...@libc.org, t...@atomide.com, 
amakha...@vmware.com, bjorn.anders...@linaro.org, h...@zytor.com, 
sparcli...@vger.kernel.org, linux-hexa...@vger.kernel.org, 
linux-ri...@lists.infradead.org, anton.iva...@cambridgegreys.com, 
jo...@southpole.se, yury.no...@gmail.com, rich...@nod.at, x...@kernel.org, 
li...@armlinux.org.uk, mi...@redhat.com, a...@eecs.berkeley.edu, 
paul...@kernel.org, h...@linux.ibm.com, stefan.kristians...@saunalahti.fi, 
openr...@lists.librecores.org, paul.walms...@sifive.com, 
linux-te...@vger.kernel.org, namhy...@kernel.org, 
andriy.shevche...@linux.intel.com, jpoim...@kernel.org, jgr...@suse.com, 
mon...@monstr.eu, linux-m...@vger.kernel.org, pal...@dabbelt.com, anup@brainfa
 ult.org, i...@jurassic.park.msu.ru, johan...@sipsolutions.net, 
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+archive=mail-archive....@lists.ozlabs.org
Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" 
<linuxppc-dev-bounces+archive=mail-archive....@lists.ozlabs.org>

On Wed, Jun 08, 2022 at 04:27:37PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> --- a/kernel/time/tick-broadcast.c
> +++ b/kernel/time/tick-broadcast.c
> @@ -622,9 +622,13 @@ struct cpumask *tick_get_broadcast_onesh
>   * to avoid a deep idle transition as we are about to get the
>   * broadcast IPI right away.
>   */
> -int tick_check_broadcast_expired(void)
> +noinstr int tick_check_broadcast_expired(void)
>  {
> +#ifdef _ASM_GENERIC_BITOPS_INSTRUMENTED_NON_ATOMIC_H
> +     return arch_test_bit(smp_processor_id(), 
> cpumask_bits(tick_broadcast_force_mask));
> +#else
>       return cpumask_test_cpu(smp_processor_id(), tick_broadcast_force_mask);
> +#endif
>  }

This is somewhat not-ideal. :/

Could we unconditionally do the arch_test_bit() variant, with a comment, or
does that not exist in some cases?

Thanks,
Mark.

Reply via email to