On Tue, 1 Jul 2008 13:27:57 -0400, Jon Smirl wrote: > On 7/1/08, Jean Delvare <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Tue, 1 Jul 2008 13:00:08 -0400, Jon Smirl wrote: > > > On 7/1/08, Grant Likely <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > My preference is for things like of_spi and of_i2c to go with the > > > > related busses; I think it makes more sense to keep all the I2C stuff > > > > together, but I've already lost that battle once. > > > > > > This is a similar problem to adding aliases to the i2c driver drivers > > > for the device tree names of the i2c devices. Instead we have code in > > > drivers/of/of_i2c.c that tries to guess the translation from device > > > tree to linux names. Adding aliases to the drivers would eliminate the > > > need for of_find_i2c_driver(). > > > > > > I've previously posted patches implementing device tree names in the > > > drivers that used ifdef to only instantiate on powerpc builds. For > > > example.... > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/i2c/chips/tps65010.c b/drivers/i2c/chips/tps65010.c > > > index e07274d..9cd1770 100644 > > > --- a/drivers/i2c/chips/tps65010.c > > > +++ b/drivers/i2c/chips/tps65010.c > > > @@ -571,6 +571,10 @@ static const struct i2c_device_id tps65010_id[] = { > > > { "tps65011", TPS65011 }, > > > { "tps65012", TPS65012 }, > > > { "tps65013", TPS65013 }, > > > + OF_ID("ti,tps65010", TPS65010) > > > + OF_ID("ti,tps65011", TPS65011) > > > + OF_ID("ti,tps65012", TPS65012) > > > + OF_ID("ti,tps65013", TPS65013) > > > { }, > > > }; > > > MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(i2c, tps65010_id); > > > > > > Yeah, yeah, you've been asking for this for months already, but it's > > just not going to happen, sorry. You want to abuse the standard Linux > > alias mechanism for your personal (i.e. openfirmware) use, but that's > > bad. Linux drivers shouldn't have to know whether they are used in > > openfirmware trees and what device names are used there. And device > > names as seen by user-space shouldn't vary depending on whether the > > device comes from an openfirmware tree or not - otherwise all > > user-space apps need to learn about both naming conversions. > > > > Unsurprisingly, no other subsystem does what you propose. > > Then what are all of the PCI aliases doing? > > The only difference is that you are recognizing the PCI group as a > naming authority and not recognizing the PowerPC device tree group. > But on the PowerPC platform that is our naming authority. That's why I > proposed adding the names on ifdefs so that they disappear on non > PowerPC platforms.
You're comparing PCI devices those ID is built-in, with I2C devices with no ID. This just can't compare. > PS - adding an alias to a driver does not change the name of the > driver. My PCI e1000 module has about 100 aliases but it is always > e1000. I said device names, not driver names. Linux I2C devices have a name attribute which contains the (Linux) device name. That's something a number of user-space applications are relying on. -- Jean Delvare _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev