On Tuesday 01 July 2008, Grant Erickson wrote: > > Yes, this was my feeling too. Not the size of the dtb but more the > > increased complexity of the EMAC device node. I would prefer Ben's idea > > with this new compatible entry too. > > In terms of the device tree expression, you would both favor something akin > to the following? > > - compatible = "ibm,emac-405exr", "ibm,emac4"; > + compatible = "ibm,emac-405exr", "ibm,emac4", > "ibm,emac4sync";
If this is how IBM/AMCC call this "new" EMAC version, then yes. Best regards, Stefan _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
