On Mon, Jul 7, 2008 at 8:07 AM, Josh Boyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, 7 Jul 2008 07:34:23 -0600 Grant Likely wrote: >> Specifically the case I'm thinking of is when a user of a Xilinx FPGA >> drops a new .dts file into arch/powerpc/boot/dts (say >> 'super-sexy-platform.dts'). However, instead of modifying the >> Makefile or always typing 'make simpleImage.super-sexy-platform', then >> can add 'simpleImage.super-sexy-platform' to their defconfig which I >> can see being easier for someone to get their head around. > > Yeah, I thought about the Virtex case with the differing bitstreams > after I sent out my original question. For purposes like that, this > seems like a great fit. For truly discrete boards, I prefer discrete > defconfigs. > > So overall I see value in the patch. If nobody else has objections, > then it's fine with me.
so.... can I have an ack? :-) g. -- Grant Likely, B.Sc., P.Eng. Secret Lab Technologies Ltd. _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev