On Mon, 07 Jul 2008 17:17:57 -0400 Josh Boyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Mon, 2008-07-07 at 23:15 +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > On Monday 07 July 2008, Josh Boyer wrote: > > > > > > On Mon, 2008-07-07 at 16:59 +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > > > On Monday 07 July 2008, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > > > > > +#define POLL_TIME 100000 /* in us */ > > > > > ^ > > > > > How about μ ? > > > > > > > > Not sure, how about µ instead? ;-) > > > > > > Erm... don't get it. You have identical characters here. > > > > That depends on the tool you use to look at it. > > > > Stephen wrote a Unicode character U+03BC from the Greek alphabet part of > > unicode, I wrote unicode character U+00B5 from the Latin-1 code page. > > In my mail client, latin-1 characters get rendered in the default font, > > but it has to change the font for less common scripts. > > I thought Unicode was supposed to _improve_ stuff like that... ;)
In fact, Arnd was right, I used the Greek letter mu (μ) while he chose the micro sign (µ). So, the lartter (Unicode 0x00B5) it should be. -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/
pgpNmpT1D5lRD.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
