On 7/15/08, Matt Sealey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > If you built this kernel yourself, you need to do it from a system with > an up-to-date binutils (2.18) otherwise, it does this. > > If you got it from somewhere (like a distribution) then please tell us > where, as there are some other troubles with load-base location for > Fedora and so on...
Is it hard to put a check into the kernel make system to look for binutils 2.17 and refuse to build with a nice error message? I poked around in the makefile but I'm not 100% sure of how it works. > > -- > Matt Sealey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Genesi, Manager, Developer Relations > > > Gabriel Paubert wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > I just tried to boot 2.6.26 on a Pegasos and the kernel does not boot. > > The last message I have is: > > gunzip (0xffffffff <----- some more hex digits) > > > > The configuration has been created from a working 2.6.25 one with > > make oldconfig and answering N to new config options. > > > > Anybody has seen this or do I have to start digging deeper? > > > > Regards, > > Gabriel > > _______________________________________________ > > Linuxppc-dev mailing list > > Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org > > https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev > > > _______________________________________________ > Linuxppc-dev mailing list > Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org > https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev > -- Jon Smirl [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev