On Jul 24, 2008, at 9:46 AM, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
Hi Kumar,
On Friday 18 July 2008, Kumar Gala wrote:
On Jul 18, 2008, at 10:30 AM, Jochen Friedrich wrote:
On Jun 18, 2008, at 12:08 PM, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
+#if defined(CONFIG_CPM2) || defined(CONFIG_8xx_GPIO)
+
+struct cpm2_ioports {
+ u32 dir, par, sor, odr, dat;
+ u32 res[3];
+};
+
is this really common for both CPM2 and 8xx? if so why the name?
It is common to CPM2 and Port E of CPM1.
but ports a-d are different on cpm1? I guess I'd like to see both
patches to understand the commonality and differences.
As Jorgen mentionned, both patches are still in patchwork:
http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/linuxppc/patch?id=19045
http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/linuxppc/patch?id=19386
Would it be possible for you to review them in time for 2.6.27 ?
Yes. Can you resend the first patch and add some details in the
commit message about the fact we can also use this code for 8xx/CPM1
port E.
- k
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
