On 9/14/2023 9:55 AM, Sean Christopherson wrote:
From: Chao Peng <chao.p.p...@linux.intel.com>
[...]
+#ifdef CONFIG_KVM_GENERIC_MEMORY_ATTRIBUTES
+/*
+ * Returns true if _all_ gfns in the range [@start, @end) have attributes
+ * matching @attrs.
+ */
+bool kvm_range_has_memory_attributes(struct kvm *kvm, gfn_t start, gfn_t end,
+                                    unsigned long attrs)
+{
+       XA_STATE(xas, &kvm->mem_attr_array, start);
+       unsigned long index;
+       bool has_attrs;
+       void *entry;
+
+       rcu_read_lock();
+
+       if (!attrs) {
+               has_attrs = !xas_find(&xas, end);
IIUIC, xas_find() is inclusive for "end", so here should be "end - 1" ?


+               goto out;
+       }
+
+       has_attrs = true;
+       for (index = start; index < end; index++) {
+               do {
+                       entry = xas_next(&xas);
+               } while (xas_retry(&xas, entry));
+
+               if (xas.xa_index != index || xa_to_value(entry) != attrs) {
+                       has_attrs = false;
+                       break;
+               }
+       }
+
+out:
+       rcu_read_unlock();
+       return has_attrs;
+}
+

[...]

Reply via email to