On Mon, 22 Jan 2024 22:43:05 -0800 Suren Baghdasaryan <sur...@google.com> wrote:
> The change [1] missed ARM architecture when fixing major fault accounting > for page fault retry under per-VMA lock. Add missing code to fix ARM > architecture fault accounting. > > [1] 46e714c729c8 ("arch/mm/fault: fix major fault accounting when retrying > under per-VMA lock") > > Fixes: 12214eba1992 ("mm: handle read faults under the VMA lock") What are the userspace-visible runtime effects of this change? Is a cc:stable backport desirable? > Reported-by: Russell King (Oracle) <rmk+ker...@armlinux.org.uk> > Signed-off-by: Suren Baghdasaryan <sur...@google.com>