John Rigby wrote:
As I type this I'm coming to like the primary flag more and more.
I'm willing to change it to 'fsl,primary-pci-bridge' though I don't
really agree with your argument against the generic name. It is in
the context of an 'fsl,pci-whatever' node so it does not have to be
specific.
It *does* have to be specific; what if "primary" comes to mean something
else in a broader context?
And maybe generic is good, a universal generic solution would be to
require all primary pci nodes to have the property then
pci_process_bridge_OF_ranges could get it out of the device node
instead of having it passed in.
The "universal generic solution" would be to encode legacy I/O devices
in the device tree, and fix Linux to not assume that they're all on one bus.
If we must have a property, how about something like "pci-legacy-io"?
-Scott
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
