On Fri, May 10, 2024 at 11:29:26AM -0700, Axel Rasmussen wrote:
> @@ -3938,7 +3938,7 @@ static vm_fault_t handle_pte_marker(struct vm_fault 
> *vmf)
>  
>       /* Higher priority than uffd-wp when data corrupted */
>       if (marker & PTE_MARKER_POISONED)
> -             return VM_FAULT_HWPOISON;
> +             return VM_FAULT_HWPOISON | VM_FAULT_HWPOISON_SILENT;

If you know here that this poisoning should be silent, why do you have
to make it all complicated and propagate it into arch code, waste
a separate VM_FAULT flag just for that instead of simply returning here
a VM_FAULT_COMPLETED or some other innocuous value which would stop
processing the fault?

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette

Reply via email to