On Thu, Jun 27, 2024 at 11:40:24AM -0700, Breno Leitao wrote: > Hello Vladimir, > > On Wed, Jun 26, 2024 at 05:06:23PM +0300, Vladimir Oltean wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 26, 2024 at 08:09:53PM +0800, kernel test robot wrote: > > > > All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>): > > > > > > >> drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/dpaa/dpaa_eth.c:3280:12: warning: stack > > > >> frame size (16664) exceeds limit (2048) in 'dpaa_eth_probe' > > > >> [-Wframe-larger-than] > > > 3280 | static int dpaa_eth_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > > > | ^ > > > 1 warning generated. > > > -- > > > >> drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/dpaa/dpaa_ethtool.c:454:12: warning: > > > >> stack frame size (8264) exceeds limit (2048) in 'dpaa_set_coalesce' > > > >> [-Wframe-larger-than] > > > 454 | static int dpaa_set_coalesce(struct net_device *dev, > > > | ^ > > > 1 warning generated. > > > > Arrays of NR_CPUS elements are what it probably doesn't like? > > Can it use the number of online CPUs instead of NR_CPUS?
I don't see how, given that variable length arrays are something which should be avoided in the kernel?
