On Fri, 2008-09-19 at 16:43 -0500, Kumar Gala wrote: > I don't have any issue with this, but why are you marking the PCI > error interrupt as shared? [snip] > this I'm a bit more skeptical about.
The only one we really need to make shared is the memory controller interrupt. I'll drop it for the PCI and L2 interrupts in the next rev of the patch. > its fsl,mpc8572.. (we need to fix the others to match that convention > as its pretty standard for other device tree nodes) I actually started out with "fsl,mpc8572-*" but then somehow convinced myself I was wrong when I saw fsl,85xx in so many other places :) Thanks for the feedback. I'll correct these and re-submit. -- Nate Case <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
