Le 30/08/2025 à 05:51, Ritesh Harjani (IBM) a écrit :
We dropped preload_new_slb_context() in the previous patch. That means

slb_setup_new_exec() was also checking preload_add() returned value but is also gone.

we don't really need preload_add() return type anymore. So let's make
it's return type to void.

s/it's/its


Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <[email protected]>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <[email protected]>
Cc: Nicholas Piggin <[email protected]>
Cc: Christophe Leroy <[email protected]>
Cc: Paul Mackerras <[email protected]>
Cc: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <[email protected]>
Cc: Donet Tom <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Signed-off-by: Ritesh Harjani (IBM) <[email protected]>
---
  arch/powerpc/mm/book3s64/slb.c | 6 +++---
  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/powerpc/mm/book3s64/slb.c b/arch/powerpc/mm/book3s64/slb.c
index 7e053c561a09..780792b9a1e5 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/mm/book3s64/slb.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/mm/book3s64/slb.c
@@ -294,7 +294,7 @@ static bool preload_hit(struct thread_info *ti, unsigned 
long esid)
        return false;
  }

-static bool preload_add(struct thread_info *ti, unsigned long ea)
+static void preload_add(struct thread_info *ti, unsigned long ea)
  {
        unsigned char idx;
        unsigned long esid;
@@ -308,7 +308,7 @@ static bool preload_add(struct thread_info *ti, unsigned 
long ea)
        esid = ea >> SID_SHIFT;

        if (preload_hit(ti, esid))
-               return false;
+               return;

        idx = (ti->slb_preload_tail + ti->slb_preload_nr) % SLB_PRELOAD_NR;
        ti->slb_preload_esid[idx] = esid;
@@ -317,7 +317,7 @@ static bool preload_add(struct thread_info *ti, unsigned 
long ea)
        else
                ti->slb_preload_nr++;

-       return true;
+       return;

You don't need a valueless return at the end of a function

  }

  static void preload_age(struct thread_info *ti)
--
2.50.1



Reply via email to